<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Sites Not Regarded Highly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.accuracast.com/social-media-7471/social-media-sites-not-regarded-highly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.accuracast.com/social-media-7471/social-media-sites-not-regarded-highly/</link>
	<description>News from the world of Internet &#38; mobile search and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:24:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Saunders</title>
		<link>http://news.accuracast.com/social-media-7471/social-media-sites-not-regarded-highly/comment-page-1/#comment-16882</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/?p=2399#comment-16882</guid>
		<description>Given a satisfaction definition of &quot;Customer satisfaction is a combination of what you get and what you expect [from a website]&quot; it would make sense that a social media site would perform less well than a site with a fairly predictable content angle like Fox. Sometimes you won&#039;t find &quot;anything&quot; on Facebook because the content is driven by your own engagement with the community to which you&#039;re connected while a news site like Fox is going to serve you whatever they want you to think. That has nothing to do with their politics, but rather a fact that they&#039;re willing to serve content consistently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given a satisfaction definition of &#8220;Customer satisfaction is a combination of what you get and what you expect [from a website]&#8221; it would make sense that a social media site would perform less well than a site with a fairly predictable content angle like Fox. Sometimes you won&#8217;t find &#8220;anything&#8221; on Facebook because the content is driven by your own engagement with the community to which you&#8217;re connected while a news site like Fox is going to serve you whatever they want you to think. That has nothing to do with their politics, but rather a fact that they&#8217;re willing to serve content consistently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

