Comments on: Google Bans Lingerie Ads For “Sexual” Content

By: wilkesy

wilkesy — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:19:32 +0000

I suffered from this ban with Google. It was quite a knock back but it had it bonus’s. It forced us to expand our advertising immediately and meant that smaller companies could no longer play on the same field as the big boys.

By: maryjanelingerie

maryjanelingerie — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:06:39 +0000

So they did not accept them in campaign ? Or started treating them as adult links and penalised ?
I don’t think these are particularly offensive, but for some may seem a little adult-oriented and suggestive. G is right to filter their ads, and I guess it is all down to criteria, which this time are a little narrow.

By: Abhijit

Abhijit — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:23:47 +0000

Google should not have banned lingerie ads, they are also doing business. How can girls can know the variety of lingerie available in the market without looking at them in order to make themselve look more hot?!

By: call me old fashioned

call me old fashioned — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:58:40 +0000

I could not agree more with Google…

There company should be allowed to decide what they consider acceptable.

I, as a consumer, am tired of being innundated with overt sexual messages.

I am a man and think women look great, but that does not mean I want to look at anyone other than my wife in any sexually overt setting.

There are plenty of soft and hard porn sites for people who want them. But…. for those of us who don’t why shove it at us all day long.

Advertisers don’t have a “right” to show what they want. They have to work inside the terms of the ad venue.

By: pantylover

pantylover — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:44:27 +0000

There’s nothing like lingerie, panties, stripping and hot girls to make it a special night