Comments on: Google Takes A Pro-Gay Stance On Proposition 8

By: Google Uses Gay Campaign To Promote Chrome | AccuraCast Digital Media News

Google Uses Gay Campaign To Promote Chrome | AccuraCast Digital Media News — Thu, 05 May 2011 16:23:28 +0000

[...] isn’t the first time that Google has shown a definite pro-gay bias. They were pretty vocal about their stance on gay marriage too, when Proposition 8 was up for debate in California. However, this is the first time such a [...]

By: Moshe Martian

Moshe Martian — Sun, 03 Apr 2011 22:44:59 +0000

Google is ran by homosexuals, so of course they back themselves. Christians, Jews, Muslims, and others know that homosexuality is perversion. Nature shows us that homosexuality is perversion.

Edit: Offensive language deleted

By: accu-puncture

accu-puncture — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 23:52:22 +0000

Wow what a touchy subject. Given the aggression of the people who support gay marriage, it takes A LOT of b#!!s to oppose gay marriage and speak out about it. Even in states where gay marriage is legal – there is a lot of aggression because the gay committee is not satisfied just as of yet. The 100% freedom has yet to be achieved – legalized bestiality – and pedophilia to name a few. … So it is going to be awhile before the gay community is ever going to be happy. Just get ready to hear even more yelling from the gay community. The guy with the stupid hearing aid in his ear – yeah the one that went along with the gay voting support – he learned his lesson after he found out what it was all about.

Edit: Ignorant, hateful text deleted.

By: Pro Prop 8

Pro Prop 8 — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:26:49 +0000

Lol…well, either way…it is what it is. There are laws against many things that don’t kill people – surely you know that. And there probably wouldn’t be a law against it if no one wanted to do it.

Your opinion is your opinion. I might quip that you need to be institutionalized and need therapy. That would be the opinion of a lot of other people.

By: Anti Prop 8

Anti Prop 8 — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:19:32 +0000

Speed limits were made to prevent deaths due to road accidents. If gay marriage killed people, I’m sure there would be laws against it.

As for your children, if their health is affected by seeing two men marry, they need to be institutionalised. Though, again, given your attitude, they probably will need therapy anyway.

By: Pro Prop 8

Pro Prop 8 — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:34:54 +0000

There has always been and will always be the restriction of some “rights” for the broader well-being of all. Ever seen a speed-limit?

Those advocating gay marriages are in the very minority (albeit very vocal as well), but do not coincide with the purposes of the establishment of the United States of America.

Fortunately, there are various places on earth that allow any sort of right you may be after and America has an open borders policy (unlike some nations) so you can leave and go exercise your right there any time you please.

By: Anti Prop 8

Anti Prop 8 — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:05:51 +0000

It’s interesting to see that Americans think they still have the right to curb the rights of others just because they’re in the majority. Mob rule?

By: David

David — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:10:11 +0000

ROFL!!!…Elizabeth nailed you with intellectual discussion and all you could try to do was respond with, be quiet because I don’t like it? Wow…. that has got to me the absolutely lamest response I have ever seen to anything! Lol…

A “mis”quote comes to mind:

“overeducated rednecks that form the minority in the mentally bankrupt nation that is the U.S.A”

By the way, Prop 8 passed the way I read it. The electorate in CA proved they are a cut above the extremist few who wish to take an alternative lifestyle and push it on my children. That I DO have a right to stand up and fight for. And will.

By: First Amazon, Now Google In Anti-Gay Row | AccuraCast Search Daily News

First Amazon, Now Google In Anti-Gay Row | AccuraCast Search Daily News — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:10:14 +0000

[...] Google’s pro-gay stance on California’s proposition 8 has shown them to be very politically correct and mindful of equal rights for everyone. While this is an automatic error caused due to the way their keyword suggestion and association algorithms work, they would do well to set the record straight by correcting this immediately, and also resetting their filters, before they are subjected to a PR nightmare similar to what Amazon is currently facing. [...]

By: AccuraCast

AccuraCast — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:11:46 +0000

@Elizabeth Please cite sources when you state numbers and expect them to be treated as fact.

Also note that we do not encourage any sort of discriminatory discussion, so if Robert or you have an opinion that sexual orientation is a legitimate reason to discriminate against someone, you can take that opinion elsewhere, no matter what poor justification you may cite to base that discimination on.

Your ilk is not welcome here. Period.

By: Elizabeth

Elizabeth — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:41:50 +0000

Robert has a point. To label someone as a “bible-bashing retard” is an intellectually bankrupt comment to prevent real discussion. you don’t know Robert and you don’t know me. please be civil (pun intended). gay unions/marriage is not about liberal or conservative values. many notable gays and lesbians disagree on the value of unions. sociologists and anthropologists know the history. out of 86 cultures over 5,000 years none have survived three generations after being sexually permissive. there are grave consequences. i understand lgbt group want to be seen as “mainstream” but this is not an area for that; not even mentioning that gays marrying would still not be an equivalent to heterosexuals. look at the netherlands. average union is 1.5 years w/ 8 lovers on the side for each partner. and in nordland, a very pro-gay community, 80% of women giving birth for the first time are out of wedlock. the scandinavien message becomes clear, when procreation is taken out of the context of marriage, illegitamacy [sic] increases; “marriage is outdated”. the soviets tried this by down playing marriage and it was a flop. they realized a child really did need one mommy and one daddy. hemming bech, a gay sociologist, sees “gay unions” as a good “tactic” but rejects common proponents of gay ideology for unions. basically, the research doesn’t support gay union reasonings.

By: Farhad

Farhad — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:08:32 +0000

Luckily we are not subject to the mindless laws that govern the bible-bashing retards that form the USA.

Perhaps Google should relocate HQ to the UK where people think on the same human wavelength and aren’t still in awe of the falseities of American religion.

By: AkashicBadger

AkashicBadger — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:51:15 +0000

Robert:
And inhumane is inhuman… you sir are inhuman… therefore Proposition 8 will end your love life if it passes.

Enjoy!

By: AccuraCast

AccuraCast — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 10:30:30 +0000

True. And you, Robert, are very, very wrong.

By: Robert R.

Robert R. — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:07:03 +0000

Would they/you be upset to see the “rights taken away” of a father to marry his son or daughter?…and why? Or a man and his horse, or Me 40 yrs to marry your child? There is a line of distinction and it isn’t determined by current politically correct whims.
Right is right and wrong is wrong.